DOJ-OGR-00002183(1).jpg

737 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court document)
File Size: 737 KB
Summary

This is page 22 of a legal filing (Document 100) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 18, 2020. The text argues that the defendant represents a significant flight risk because extradition from the UK or France is legally complex, lengthy, and not guaranteed, even if the defendant currently waives her rights to challenge it. The prosecution cites case law (Namer, Cilins, Abdullahu) to support the argument that the difficulty of extradition supports continued detention pending trial.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referred to as 'the defendant' throughout the text; subject of the flight risk and extradition arguments (Case 1:20-c...
Secretary of State UK Government Official
Mentioned as having discretion to deny extradition requests in the UK.
Namer Case Citation Subject
Cited in United States v. Namer regarding flight risk.
Cilins Case Citation Subject
Cited in Cilins precedent regarding flight risk.
Abdullahu Case Citation Subject
Cited in United States v. Abdullahu regarding flight risk.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Government
Referred to as 'The Government'; arguing against the defendant's release.
OIA
Office of International Affairs; provided information to the prosecution regarding UK extradition difficulties.
United States District Court
Implied by the case filing header.

Locations (3)

Location Context
Jurisdiction seeking extradition and prosecution.
Potential location for extradition; laws cited regarding extradition difficulties.
Potential location for extradition; laws cited regarding inability to waive extradition rights effectively.

Relationships (1)

The Government Advisory OIA
The Government understands from OIA...

Key Quotes (5)

"The Government understands from OIA that extradition from the United Kingdom is frequently extensively litigated, uncertain, and subject to multiple levels of appeal."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002183(1).jpg
Quote #1
"Ultimately, although the defendant purports to be willing to waive her right to challenge being extradited to the United States, she simply cannot do so under the laws of France and the United Kingdom"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002183(1).jpg
Quote #2
"The defendant’s written waivers of extradition from France and the United Kingdom certainly provide no guarantee that the defendant will not flee to a third country"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002183(1).jpg
Quote #3
"Courts have recognized that lack of an effective means of extradition can increase a defendant’s flight risk"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002183(1).jpg
Quote #4
"“The inability to extradite defendant should he flee weighs in favor of detention.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002183(1).jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document