DOJ-OGR-00001749.jpg
703 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / judicial order
File Size:
703 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a court order filed on September 2, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court denies the Defendant's request to modify a protective order to disclose documents to judicial officers in other civil cases, citing a lack of good cause and noting that the relevant facts are already public. The text reveals that the Government previously issued grand jury subpoenas to an entity referred to as 'Recipient' regarding an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Referring to the defendant in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Ghislaine Maxwell, though not explicitly named on this page), w...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned as the subject of a Government grand jury investigation along with possible co-conspirators.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
The prosecution/DOJ, which opened the grand jury investigation and filed a docketed letter.
|
|
| Recipient |
An unnamed entity that received grand jury subpoenas and claimed inability to turn over materials without modificatio...
|
|
| The Court |
The judicial body issuing this order and denying the defendant's request.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-09-02
Relationships (2)
Text mentions investigation into 'Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators' in the context of the Defendant's case.
Government issued grand jury subpoenas to the Recipient.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Defendant’s request is DENIED on this basis."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001749.jpg
Quote #1
"Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity (“Recipient”) after the Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001749.jpg
Quote #2
"the Defendant proffers no more than vague, speculative, and conclusory assertions as to why that is the case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001749.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document