DOJ-OGR-00010661.jpg
576 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal memorandum (government sentencing submission)
File Size:
576 KB
Summary
This document is page 2 of a government filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 24, 2022. The Government argues that victims have a right to be heard at sentencing and opposes the defendant's request to redact victim impact statements, citing that privacy interests belong to the victims, not the defendant. The filing cites legal precedents (Eberhard, Lugosch) regarding the Court's discretion to accept information and the standards for sealing documents.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the sentencing; requested redactions of victim impact statements (Case 1:20-cr-00330 corresponds to Ghisla...
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Opposes redaction of victim impact statements; defers to Court on acceptance of unsolicited statements
|
| The Court | Judicial Body |
Decision maker at sentencing; has discretion to consider information
|
| Victims | Victims |
Have rights to be heard; possess the privacy interest in the documents
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by case header and 'The Court'
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by footer DOJ-OGR)
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (referenced in legal citations)
|
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga |
Referenced in case citation Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
|
Timeline (1 events)
Future (relative to document)
Relationships (1)
The Government opposes the redaction requests made by the defendant.
Key Quotes (4)
"victims have a right to be heard in connection with sentencing under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010661.jpg
Quote #1
"the Government opposes the redaction of any victim impact statements."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010661.jpg
Quote #2
"To the extent there is a privacy interest at stake in these documents, it belongs to the victims, who are not seeking to file these letters under seal."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010661.jpg
Quote #3
"No due process interest is protected by withholding victim impact statements from the public."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010661.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document