DOJ-OGR-00016593.jpg
624 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (trial testimony)
File Size:
624 KB
Summary
This document is page 110 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, who is explaining the scientific peer-review process and confirming their experience serving on editorial boards for psychology journals. The document includes standard court headers, line numbers, and a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness |
Testifying under direct examination regarding scientific peer review and psychology.
|
| Unknown Attorney | Interrogator |
Asking questions (labeled as 'Q.') during direct examination.
|
| Jury | Audience |
Addressed by the attorney to receive the explanation of the peer review process.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number prefix and 'Southern District Reporters'.
|
Relationships (1)
Witness states they have served on editorial boards of many major journals in the field of psychology.
Key Quotes (3)
"Generally, when we do an experiment or a set of experiments, we will write up a scientific publication, submit it hopefully to a peer-reviewed journal..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016593.jpg
Quote #1
"Members of the scientific community that will review a manuscript that has been submitted for publication, will review that manuscript and will make recommendations to the editor..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016593.jpg
Quote #2
"But over the years, many of the major journals in the field of psychology."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016593.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document