DOJ-OGR-00019422.jpg

685 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / court filing (appeal)
File Size: 685 KB
Summary

This document is page 18 of a legal brief filed on September 24, 2020, in Case 20-3061 (likely the Second Circuit appeal regarding Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines Maxwell's argument that the civil appeal court should reverse Judge Preska's order to unseal her depositions. She argues that unsealing the documents now would prejudice her ability to challenge the government's conduct (specifically an alleged violation of 'Martindell' by obtaining civil depositions for criminal use) before Judge Nathan in her pending criminal case.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Arguing against the unsealing of deposition materials to protect her defense in a criminal case.
Judge Preska District Court Judge (Civil)
Issued the order unsealing the deposition material which Maxwell is appealing.
Judge Nathan District Court Judge (Criminal)
Presiding over the criminal case; the judge before whom Maxwell intends to challenge the government's conduct.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government
Prosecution; accused by Maxwell of circumventing Martindell to obtain depositions.
District Court
Lower court where the cases are being heard.
Court of Appeals
Implied 'this Court' hearing the civil appeal.

Timeline (2 events)

Future (relative to doc)
Maxwell intends to argue violation of Martindell before Judge Nathan.
Criminal Court
Prior to 2020-09-24
Judge Preska issued an order unsealing deposition material.
District Court

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal (Appellant/Judge) Judge Preska
Maxwell is appealing Judge Preska's unsealing order.
Ghislaine Maxwell Legal (Defendant/Judge) Judge Nathan
Maxwell intends to make arguments to Judge Nathan in the criminal case.

Key Quotes (4)

"Ms. Maxwell is not asking this Court to rule on the propriety of the government’s conduct in circumventing Martindell"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019422.jpg
Quote #1
"unless this Court reverses Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material, Ms. Maxwell may never be able to challenge before Judge Nathan the government’s conduct in obtaining her depositions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019422.jpg
Quote #2
"The civil case is not the appropriate forum to litigate the government’s apparent violation of Martindell."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019422.jpg
Quote #3
"Keeping the deposition material sealed will"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019422.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document