DOJ-OGR-00016749.jpg
562 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (criminal case)
File Size:
562 KB
Summary
This document is page 20 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. The content captures a procedural discussion where the Judge ('The Court') outlines the legal requirements for introducing extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement to impeach a witness, citing United States v. Gulani. Ms. Menninger briefly responds to a question about a pseudonym.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (likely Prosecutor) |
Answering a question from the Judge regarding a pseudonym.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Outlining legal standards for offering extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements.
|
| AJN | Judge (Initials in case header) |
Judge Alison J. Nathan (inferred from case number suffix).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York (cited in legal precedent).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court is defining the legal standard for impeaching a witness.
Southern District of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by case number and reporter footer.
|
Relationships (1)
Dialogue exchange in court transcript.
Key Quotes (3)
"Second, the parties seeking to offer extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement must have laid a proper foundation for doing so..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016749.jpg
Quote #1
"Finally, even if all these requirements have been satisfied, the trial court nevertheless may exclude the extrinsic evidence under Rule 403 on an appropriate finding."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016749.jpg
Quote #2
"At issue first is step 2, whether the witness being impeached had an opportunity to explain or deny the statement."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016749.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document