DOJ-OGR-00009754.jpg
711 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / memorandum of law
File Size:
711 KB
Summary
This document is page 62 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated March 11, 2022. It presents legal arguments citing 'Brown v. Maxwell' and 'Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.' regarding the definition of 'judicial documents' and the presumption of public access. The filing argues specifically against releasing 'Juror No. 50's pleadings,' claiming that doing so would generate prejudicial publicity and infringe upon Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The document argues that releasing certain pleadings would prejudice her right to fair and impartial proceedings.
|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
The filing argues against releasing this juror's pleadings to the public.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited as establishing the legal framework for public access to judicial documents (2d Cir.).
|
|
| District Court |
Mentioned in the context of striking material from filings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
Maxwell's defense is arguing to keep Juror No. 50's pleadings sealed to protect Maxwell's fair trial rights.
Key Quotes (3)
"There exists no compelling reason to release Juror No. 50’s pleadings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009754.jpg
Quote #1
"Any public release of the documents will set off another round of publicity, speculation, and commentary, all of which is prejudicial to the truth finding process and Ms. Maxwell’s rights to fair and impartial proceedings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009754.jpg
Quote #2
"We think that the item filed must be relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process in order for it to be designated a judicial document."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009754.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document