DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
999 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
999 KB
Summary
This document contains pages 225-228 of a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas. The text documents the redirect examination of Ms. Conrad, a former juror, who is being aggressively questioned about whether she followed Judge Pauley's instructions and whether she perjured herself during voir dire (jury selection). Conrad admits to not following instructions regarding voir dire and acknowledges 'omissions,' but insists she rendered a fair verdict.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness / Juror |
Former juror being questioned about potential misconduct and perjury during voir dire.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption: United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Raises objections during the examination.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
The judge who presided over the original trial and gave the instructions being discussed.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the current hearing, rules on objections.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters |
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
|
|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by the document stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (1 events)
February 15, 2012
Court hearing/Redirect examination of Ms. Conrad regarding juror misconduct.
Southern District Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and the nature of the Daugerdas...
|
Relationships (2)
Conrad was a juror in a trial presided over by Judge Pauley.
Okula objects to questions directed at Conrad; Conrad refers to 'Mr. Okula's questions'.
Key Quotes (6)
"Did your perjury in voir dire affect your ability to act as a fair and impartial juror?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
Quote #1
"I didn't follow the instructions in voir dire."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
Quote #2
"You know for a fact you didn't follow all those instructions, don't you?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
Quote #3
"Taking into account the fact that you perjured yourself repeatedly at voir dire, did you follow all of his instructions?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
Quote #4
"Not with my omissions, no."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
Quote #5
"However you want to characterize it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document