DOJ-OGR-00008433.jpg
605 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (letter/motion reply)
File Size:
605 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It presents defense arguments supporting the admissibility of testimony from a witness named Mr. Hamilton regarding statements made by 'Kate,' arguing that this evidence proves bias and is not a collateral matter. The text cites various legal precedents to refute the government's objections.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the letter (The Honorable)
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell; proponent of the testimony
|
| Mr. Hamilton | Witness |
Potential witness whose testimony regarding 'Kate' is being debated
|
| Kate | Witness/Accuser |
Person whose statements and potential bias are the subject of Mr. Hamilton's proposed testimony
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government |
Prosecution/DOJ, opposing the testimony
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Court of Appeals cited in case law
|
|
| 5th Cir. |
Court of Appeals cited in case law
|
|
| D.C. Cir. |
Court of Appeals cited in case law
|
Timeline (1 events)
December 15, 2021
Relationships (2)
Document discusses 'Kate's statements to Mr. Hamilton' regarding bias.
Ms. Maxwell proposes testimony of Mr. Hamilton.
Key Quotes (4)
"What Ms. Maxwell proposes for the testimony of Mr. Hamilton is exactly what the law allows."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008433.jpg
Quote #1
"“[B]ias or interest of a witness is not a collateral issue, and extrinsic evidence is admissible thereon.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008433.jpg
Quote #2
"Conspicuously, the government cites no authority for the proposition that Ms. Maxwell cannot ask Mr. Hamilton about Kate’s statements to him."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008433.jpg
Quote #3
"Kate’s statements to Mr. Hamilton are neither specific instances of conduct under Rule 608 nor prior inconsistent statements under Rule 613."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008433.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document