DOJ-OGR-00020789.jpg
636 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal ruling
File Size:
636 KB
Summary
This page is from a court order in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court addresses discovery disputes, specifically ruling that the Government's agreement to produce 'Giglio' and 'Jencks Act' materials six weeks prior to trial is sufficient for Maxwell to prepare, noting the Court lacks authority to force earlier disclosure of Jencks material. The Court also denies Maxwell's request for a pretrial hearing regarding the admissibility of co-conspirator statements, opting instead for conditional admission at trial.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court order; seeking expedited discovery of Jencks Act material and hearings on co-conspirator stateme...
|
| AJN | Judge (implied by case number) |
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Judge Alison J. Nathan).
|
| Coppa | Legal Precedent Name |
Referenced in legal citation regarding discovery timing.
|
| Tracy | Legal Precedent Name |
Referenced in legal citation regarding co-conspirator statements.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution team; agreed to produce materials six weeks before trial.
|
|
| The Court |
The judicial body issuing the order (District Court).
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, cited in legal precedents.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Six weeks prior to trial
Relationships (1)
Maxwell seeks expedited discovery; Government agrees to specific timelines; Court mediates.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court concludes that Maxwell will be able to effectively prepare for trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020789.jpg
Quote #1
"The Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, 'provides that no prior statement made by a government witness shall be the subject of discovery until that witness has testified on direct examination.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020789.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court therefore lacks the inherent power to expedite these disclosures."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020789.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court also rejects Maxwell’s alternative request for a hearing to determine the admissibility of co-conspirator declarations."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020789.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document