DOJ-OGR-00021012.jpg

629 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court order/opinion)
File Size: 629 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal ruling (likely denying a new trial) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It discusses a jury note asking for clarification on 'Count Four' regarding whether aiding a victim's ('Jane') return flight constitutes guilt if the defendant did not aid the initial flight to New Mexico for sexual activity. The Court rejects Maxwell's argument that the jury instruction was unclear or that it constructively amended the indictment, noting that Jane testified about numerous flights on both Epstein's private plane and commercial airlines.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referred to as 'the Defendant' and 'Maxwell'; arguing regarding jury instructions and constructive amendment to the I...
Jane Victim/Witness
Testified about taking numerous flights; subject of the jury's question regarding 'transportation' and 'sexual activi...
Jeffrey Epstein Associate
Mentioned regarding 'Epstein's private plane'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court
Issued the ruling, responded to jury notes.
The Jury
Submitted a note asking for clarification on Count Four.

Timeline (2 events)

1997
Flight from New York to New Mexico
New York to New Mexico
Jane Ghislaine Maxwell (implied)
2022-04-29
Filing of Document 657
Court

Locations (3)

Location Context
Destination of a flight mentioned in the jury note and a 1997 flight.
Origin of a 1997 flight mentioned in arguments.
Destination of an unidentified return flight mentioned in arguments.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Alleged Trafficker/Victim Jane
Discussion of Maxwell aiding in the transportation of Jane for sexual activity.
Jane Victim/Perpetrator (implied) Jeffrey Epstein
Jane testified about flying on Epstein's private plane.

Key Quotes (4)

"Under Count Four (4), if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane’s return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021012.jpg
Quote #1
"Jane testified about taking numerous flights both on Epstein’s private plane and on commercial carriers."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021012.jpg
Quote #2
"The Defendant speculates extensively about which flights and evidence the jury was referencing in the note"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021012.jpg
Quote #3
"the note was not 'crystal clear' as the Defendant contends."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021012.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document