DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
683 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal opinion / appellate court document
File Size:
683 KB
Summary
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (likely an appellate opinion) dated September 17, 2024. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' of her indictment, specifically concerning testimony about sexual abuse in New Mexico. The court affirms the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Appealing a District Court denial regarding constructive amendment and prejudicial variance.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in a quote regarding intent to engage in sexual activity.
|
| Dove | Legal Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Dove.
|
| Khalupsky | Legal Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Khalupsky.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
The lower court whose decision is being appealed.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Implied by citations (2d Cir.) and the appellate nature of the text ('We review...').
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR-00021814).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unknown (during trial)
Testimony presented regarding a witness's sexual abuse.
New Mexico (abuse location), Courtroom (testimony location)
Witness
Jury
Unknown (prior to appeal)
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of the District Court's response.
District Court
Unknown (prior to appeal)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where testimony about a witness's sexual abuse occurred.
|
|
|
Referenced in relation to violation of New York law.
|
Relationships (1)
Text refers to intent that Jane engage in sexual activity.
Key Quotes (4)
"Maxwell appeals the District Court’s denial and argues that the alleged constructive amendment is a per se violation of the Grand Jury Clause of the Fifth Amendment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
Quote #1
"Specifically, Maxwell argues that testimony about a witness’s sexual abuse in New Mexico presented the jury with another basis for conviction, which is distinct from the charges in the Indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
Quote #2
"We disagree and affirm the District Court’s denial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
Quote #3
"intent that Jane engage in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense in violation of New York law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021814.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document