DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
604 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
604 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) and Mr. Everdell (defense) before the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs intended to prove a 'continuing relationship' between a witness (pseudonym 'Jane') and the defendant. The Court rules to allow the evidence, citing that it is not prejudicial under Rule 403, while emphasizing the need to maintain the witness's anonymity.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Argues regarding impeachment and relevance of evidence.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presides over the hearing, rules on relevance and prejudice (Rule 403), and allows evidence while protecting witness ...
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Argues for the admission of photographs to show a continuing relationship and discusses instructions given to a witne...
|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness using a pseudonym to protect anonymity; subject of the testimony/evidence discussion.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding the admissibility of photographic evidence and witness anonymity protocols.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters and Case Number structure (1:20-cr-00330-PAE is a SDNY case).
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Everdell states: 'these photographs show that the relationship continued.'
Mr. Everdell states: 'I've met with the witness and I've impressed upon her that she should only use the name Jane.'
Key Quotes (4)
"And these photographs show that the relationship continued."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't think it's 403 prejudice to have duplicative evidence of the nature of the relationship."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
Quote #2
"mindful of the need to continue to protect the anonymity of the witness, I would allow it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
Quote #3
"I've impressed upon her that she should only use the name Jane."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document