📧 Communication

legal document

Communication Details

From
Unnamed author (likely the Government) Linked to Unnamed author (likely the Government)
To
Honorable Alison J. Nathan Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Date
August 21, 2020
Subject
Justification for sealing grand jury records and First Amendment right of access.
Message Content

This document is page 2 of a legal filing arguing for the continued sealing of grand jury materials. It cites historical precedent and various court cases to counter the First Amendment's presumptive right of public access to judicial documents, asserting that sealing is necessary and justified.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00001738.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated August 21, 2020, addressed to the Honorable Alison J. Nathan. The author, presumably the Government, argues for keeping grand jury-related exhibits under seal by citing historical precedent for grand jury secrecy and analyzing the First Amendment's presumptive right of public access. The filing references multiple court cases to support the position that sealing is justified and necessary to protect higher values, even when a presumptive right of access applies.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication