Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post, calling her 'brave enough to come forward' and 'thank[ing] her for sharing her[] [story] as well.' He explained he had 'randomly seen' the post and 'felt like [he] wanted to comment.'
This legal document details a court's finding that Juror 50 is credible, despite inconsistencies in his jury selection questionnaire. The court analyzed a supportive comment the juror made on Twitter to Annie Farmer, concluding it did not contradict his testimony about not widely discussing his own sexual abuse. Ultimately, the court determined the juror's errors were not intentional deception and he would not have been dismissed for cause had he answered accurately.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication