📧 Communication

social media comment

Communication Details

From
To
["Annie Farmer"] ["Annie Farmer"]
Date
January 01, 2022
Subject
Comment on a post about sharing a story
Message Content

Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post, calling her 'brave enough to come forward' and 'thank[ing] her for sharing her[] [story] as well.' He explained he had 'randomly seen' the post and 'felt like [he] wanted to comment.'

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010346.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This legal document details a court's finding that Juror 50 is credible, despite inconsistencies in his jury selection questionnaire. The court analyzed a supportive comment the juror made on Twitter to Annie Farmer, concluding it did not contradict his testimony about not widely discussing his own sexual abuse. Ultimately, the court determined the juror's errors were not intentional deception and he would not have been dismissed for cause had he answered accurately.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication