📧 Communication

depositions

Communication Details

From
To
Court/Attorneys Court/Attorneys
Subject
Legal Testimony
Message Content

Mentioned as context for defamatory statements

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015622.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This is page 2 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). The document argues against Dershowitz's motion to seal court records, pointing out the hypocrisy of his public statements calling for transparency while legally attempting to seal documents. It cites Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. to establish the heavy burden of proof required to deny public access to court records.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication