A conversation between Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Brune where Ms. Trzaskoma wondered if Juror No. 1 could be a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Ms. Brune testifies that they concluded it made no sense and that Ms. Trzaskoma did not mention a Westlaw report.
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. Brune is questioned about a prior conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma, in which they discussed the possibility that Juror No. 1 might be a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they dismissed the idea as nonsensical and asserts confidently that Ms. Trzaskoma never mentioned a Westlaw report on the matter, citing the thorough nature of another colleague, Laurie Edelstein, as the basis for her certainty.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication