Juror 50 described the jury's deliberation process to The Daily Mail, stating they performed their due diligence, felt sympathy for the defendant but set aside the defendant's decision not to testify, and methodically reviewed evidence to reach a verdict without pressure.
This document is a legal filing by the government arguing against a defendant's motion for a new trial. It cites legal precedent establishing a high bar for granting new trials and uses statements made by 'Juror 50' to The Daily Mail to demonstrate that the jury's deliberations were thorough, methodical, and proper. The government contends that the juror's account shows the verdict was based on evidence and not external pressures or improper considerations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication