📧 Communication
court testimonyCommunication Details
Attorney Conrad conducts a direct examination of a witness regarding statements the witness made on December 20th, calling a defense motion 'irrational' and 'ridiculous'. The witness is evasive, frequently claims not to recall details, and is questioned about comments made to Judge Pauley regarding his background as a 'Clinton appointee'.
📄 Source Document
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the direct examination of an unnamed witness by an attorney named Conrad regarding the witness's prior statements in court, where they called a defense motion 'ridiculous' and made comments to Judge Pauley about his background. The witness is largely uncooperative, frequently claiming a lack of recall, leading to a tense exchange about their motives and credibility.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication