📧 Communication
Court dialogueCommunication Details
From
MR. PAGLIUCA
Linked to MR. PAGLIUCA
To
["THE COURT"]
["The Court"]
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Inconsistency in witness testimony regarding dates of alleged incidents.
Message Content
Mr. Pagliuca argues that a witness's testimony should be impeached due to a discrepancy in the timeline of alleged events. He states the indictment and direct testimony mentioned 2001, but the complaint and cross-examination point to a 2002-2003 timeframe.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00018802.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the court. Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to impeach a witness's testimony by highlighting a chronological inconsistency regarding the start date of alleged incidents, claiming they occurred from 2002-2003 rather than starting in 2001 as stated in the indictment and the witness's direct testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication