Asked if conviction on Count Four was possible if Maxwell assisted with Jane's return trip but not the flight to NM, and regarding intent for sexual activity in NM.
This document is page 10 of a legal filing from March 2022 in the US v. Maxwell case. The defense argues that a Jury Note regarding Count Four indicates the jury was considering convicting Maxwell based on intent for sexual activity occurring in New Mexico, which the defense claims raises a 'constructive amendment' issue. The text disputes the government's interpretation of the note, accusing the government of inserting a comma to alter the meaning and downplay the jury's focus on New Mexico.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication