📧 Communication
meetingCommunication Details
From
Mr. Everdell
Linked to Mr. Everdell
To
The Court
THE COURT
Date
July 22, 2022
Subject
Sentencing Guidelines Argument
Message Content
Oral argument regarding which sentencing guidelines book applies (2003 vs 2004) and the Ex Post Facto Clause.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00011538.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is page 19 of a court transcript from a sentencing hearing filed on July 22, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the 2003 sentencing guidelines should apply rather than the 2004 guidelines to avoid violating the Ex Post Facto Clause, noting that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 240 months despite a calculated range of 292-365 months.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication