📧 Communication

Oral Argument (Rebuttal)

Communication Details

From
To
The Court THE COURT
Subject
Defense Rebuttal
Message Content

Argued brothers were not present, sent to get water, and lacked intent.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017262.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the 'Tison v. Arizona' case discussed) describing Supreme Court oral arguments. The text details the legal debate regarding the 'felony murder' rule, specifically whether the brothers (Ricky and Raymond) had the specific intent to kill the Lyons family or were merely present. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the Congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely included to illustrate the author's legal philosophy or history.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication