Oral argument regarding whether exhibit 824 adds value beyond 823 and the need to speak with Ms. Gill.
This is a page from a court transcript (US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between the defense (Sternheim) and prosecution (Rohrbach) regarding the admissibility of evidence (exhibits 823 and 824) and hearsay concerns. The prosecution mentions Ms. Gill, the head of HR for Mar-a-Lago, noting she has reviewed a specific employment file relevant to the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication