📧 Communication
Court proceeding dialogueCommunication Details
From
MS. STERNHEIM
Linked to Ms. Sternheim
To
["THE COURT", "MS. POMERANTZ"]
["THE COURT", "MS. POMERANTZ"]
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Clarification on questioning a witness
Message Content
Ms. Sternheim corrected Ms. Pomerantz, stating her intended question was not about the ex-husband but about whether the witness had asked a friend to plant drugs on the father of her child.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00018408.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a sidebar discussion where a judge rules to exclude evidence of a single sexual harassment allegation due to a lack of a pattern or proffer of falsity. Following the ruling, two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim, discuss a planned line of questioning for a witness. Ms. Sternheim clarifies her intent is not to ask about the witness's ex-husband, but rather to ask if the witness had requested a friend to plant drugs on the father of her child.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication