Acosta explained to OPR his rationale for allowing Departmental review of Epstein's concerns and his frustration with the defense's collateral attacks.
This legal document analyzes decisions made by U.S. Attorney Acosta that created difficulties in enforcing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein. It details the USAO's internal debate on whether to declare a breach of the agreement and highlights a critical change Acosta made to the NPA's language, weakening the requirement for Epstein to enter a guilty plea. The document suggests these decisions made it significantly harder for the USAO to prove Epstein was intentionally failing to comply with the agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication