The Court received regular updates regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement based on regular communications between the Government and Bureau of Prisons legal counsel.
This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's request for a lenient sentence. The prosecution refutes the defendant's claims of harsh pretrial confinement conditions, stating the Court was well-informed and the conditions did not warrant a downward variance. The filing also dismisses the defendant's comparison to the Harvey Weinstein case, asserting that her federal child exploitation crimes are different and warrant a significant sentence, citing a similar case (United States v. Maria Soly Almonte) as precedent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication