📧 Communication
noteCommunication Details
From
Juror No. 1
Linked to Juror No. 1
To
Court/Parties involved
Court/Parties involved
Subject
Potential identity of Juror No. 1
Message Content
A note received from Juror No. 1 prompted Ms. Trzaskoma to recall a suspended lawyer with the same name and wonder if they were the same person.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00009390.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a page from a legal transcript where a witness, Edelstein, recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma. The discussion focused on whether Juror No. 1 was the same individual as a suspended lawyer named Catherine M. Conrad. Edelstein testifies that while Ms. Trzaskoma initially considered the possibility, she concluded they were not the same person after reviewing the juror's voir dire responses, which were inconsistent with being a lawyer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication