OPR conducted interviews with subjects to understand how the two-year sentence requirement was developed, but was unable to get a clear understanding due to the passage of time.
This document is a section of a report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) analyzing prosecutor Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. OPR criticizes Acosta's decision to prematurely end the investigation and accept a lenient 18-month sentence, forgoing the pursuit of crucial computer evidence. The report also notes OPR's inability to determine the basis for an earlier two-year sentence proposal, highlighting a lack of clarity and justification in the prosecution's strategy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication