Trove
Sign In Sign Up

📧 Communication

Courtroom dialogue
← Back to List

Communication Details

From
MR. PAGLIUCA Linked to MR. PAGLIUCA
To
["THE COURT"] ["The Court"]
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Admissibility of paragraphs 207 and 208 for impeachment
Message Content

Mr. Pagliuca argues to admit paragraphs 207 and 208 concerning Sarah Kellen, claiming they represent impeachment by omission because Ms. Maxwell's name is not mentioned. The Court questions the inconsistency and ultimately sustains the objection, ruling the paragraphs inadmissible on those grounds.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00018812.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to introduce paragraphs 207 and 208 regarding Sarah Kellen as impeachment evidence, but the Court sustains the objection. The judge rules the paragraphs inadmissible, distinguishing them from prior evidence because they do not mention Ms. Maxwell or other unnamed employees.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication