A note written by juror Catherine Conrad, the contents of which are being argued over to determine if they show prejudice. The speaker argues that Rule 606(b) precludes drawing inferences from this note.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 24, 2022, involving an individual named Mr. Parse accused of defrauding the government. An attorney, identified as CAC3PARC, argues before a judge about the nature of a mistake made in the case and, more significantly, about the interpretation of a juror's note written by Catherine Conrad. The attorney contends that under Rule 606(b) and precedent from a Third Circuit case, the note cannot be used to infer prejudice.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication