📧 Communication

In-person conversation

Communication Details

From
To
Brune and Ms. Edelstein Edelstein
Subject
Juror No. 1's identity
Message Content

Discussion about whether Juror No. 1 is a suspended lawyer based on a juror note and voir dire history.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010020.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 4, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Brune. Brune describes a conversation with colleagues Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein (Theresa) while walking to 52 Duane, concerning suspicions that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer. They discuss the juror's background revealed during voir dire, specifically a personal injury suit in the Bronx, and the juror's use of legal concepts like 'vicarious liability' and 'respondeat superior' which the witness notes are out of place in a criminal case.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication