The Government filed a letter bringing Juror 50's public statements to the Court's attention and seeking an inquiry. The Government attempted to confer with defense counsel before filing but received no response.
This legal document argues against the defendant's position that Juror 50's motion to intervene should be sealed. The author asserts that the motion is a judicial document that should be publicly docketed, citing the case Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga and refuting the defendant's claims that it is merely a discovery request or that public filing would interfere with testimony. A footnote defends the Government's prior action of publicly filing a letter about Juror 50's public statements, stating it was appropriate and that an attempt was made to confer with defense counsel beforehand.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication