A second juror, whose identity is unknown, alerted the New York Times that they had been a victim of childhood sexual abuse, a fact they allegedly failed to disclose during jury selection.
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that the court should investigate potential misconduct by two jurors. The motion contends that Rule of Evidence 606(b) does not bar an inquiry into Juror No. 50's alleged bias and false statements, and that a second juror who alerted the New York Times about being a victim of childhood sexual abuse should also be questioned. The argument is that failing to investigate these matters violates Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication