📧 Communication

interview

Communication Details

From
To
["OPR"] ["OPR"]
Subject
Decision-making in the Epstein case
Message Content

Acosta acknowledged to OPR that his attempt to use the NPA to backstop the state prosecution was arguably more intrusive than a direct federal prosecution.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00021373.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report analyzing prosecutor Acosta's handling of the Epstein case. OPR concludes that Acosta's concerns about federalism led him to craft a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that paradoxically intruded more on state authority and had negative consequences due to the federal team's unfamiliarity with the state court system. This lack of familiarity, a concern raised by fellow prosecutor Villafaña, resulted in unforeseen outcomes like Epstein obtaining work release, which was contrary to the prosecutors' intent.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication