📧 Communication

Legal Argument

Communication Details

From
To
Courts (Judge McMahon/Judge Netburn) Courts (Judge McMahon/Judge Netburn)
Subject
Application to modify Rule 26(c) protective orders
Message Content

Arguments regarding the applicability of the Martindell standard.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is page 106 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text details the Government's argument that it did not circumvent the 'Martindell' legal standard when seeking evidence previously under protective orders, specifically referring to a subpoena issued to the law firm Boies Schiller. It notes that Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled that the Government had demonstrated 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the release of testimony to the grand jury despite previous protective orders.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication