📧 Communication

Article

Communication Details

From
To
Public (Financial Times readers) Financial Times
Date
August 24, 2011
Subject
Why Libya sceptics were proved badly wrong
Message Content

Opinion piece arguing that the intervention in Libya was justified and strategically sound for the US and the West, countering skeptical views.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024599.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a scanned copy of a Financial Times opinion article dated August 24, 2011, written by Anne-Marie Slaughter. The article defends the US and Western intervention in Libya against skeptics (specifically naming Richard Haass), arguing that preventing Gaddafi's victory was crucial for supporting democracy and maintaining strategic interests in the Middle East. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a Congressional investigation.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication