A witness, Loftus, is questioned about the requirement to cause no harm to participants in human experiments. Loftus confirms this requirement limits the types of studies conducted, particularly regarding the creation of false memories, and gives examples of proposals that might be approved versus those that might be considered too sensitive.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the ethical review process for psychological experiments on humans, explaining how the requirement to 'cause no harm' limits the scope of research, particularly in studies on false memories. Loftus provides examples of both approvable and potentially unapprovable experiments that a 'human subjects review committee' might consider.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication