Mr. Foy argues to the court that his client should not be required to surrender her personal firearm as a condition of release. He states the allegation is nonviolent, she has no criminal history, and she legally possesses the firearm. The court asks if the firearm is for duty or personal use, to which Mr. Foy replies it is personal.
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 16, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. An attorney, Mr. Foy, is arguing that his client should not be required to surrender her personal firearm as a condition of release, citing her lack of a criminal record, the nonviolent nature of the allegation, and her legal right to possess the weapon. The court's only interjection is to ask whether the firearm is for duty or personal use.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication