📧 Communication
Courtroom dialogueCommunication Details
An attorney (presumed to be Ms. Moe) argues that a sequentially numbered book qualifies as a business record and should be admissible. The argument focuses on the timing of record creation, stating that the rule does not require records to be made at the exact moment of an event. The Court and Ms. Moe then have a brief exchange.
📄 Source Document
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the business records exception to the hearsay rule. An attorney, Ms. Moe, argues for the admissibility of a sequentially numbered book as evidence, contending that the law does not require records to be created at the precise moment of an event. The judge indicates they will research the relevant case law on the issue before making a ruling.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication