📧 Communication
meetingCommunication Details
From
BSF
Linked to BSF
To
Government
Government officials
Date
January 01, 2016
Subject
Unknown (implied cooperation)
Message Content
A meeting between the law firm BSF and the Government which Maxwell argues should have been disclosed.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00004802.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This page is from a legal ruling in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The court rejects arguments for suppression under 'Franks,' ruling that even if the Government failed to disclose a 2016 meeting with the law firm BSF to Judge McMahon, she would still have granted the modification of the protective order due to 'extraordinary circumstances' and 'significant public interest.' The text establishes that protective orders do not guarantee immunity from criminal subpoenas.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication