Discussion regarding document tagging in e-discovery software. Sender notes an attached document (2007 subpoena) was marked 'potential Brady' but believes it is 'work product' and asks for verification before changing the tag.
An internal email from March 10, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email discusses the classification of an attached document in the 'relativity' e-discovery system. The attachment is a Grand Jury subpoena from March 2, 2007. The sender is querying whether the document should remain marked as 'potential Brady' material (exculpatory evidence) or be switched to 'work product'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication