Mr. Pagliuca objects to the implication that moving to a smaller apartment means someone has no money.
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. During the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to a line of questioning, arguing that moving to a smaller apartment does not prove a lack of money. The Court overrules the objection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication