📧 Communication
Court proceeding dialogueCommunication Details
From
THE COURT
Linked to THE COURT
To
["Counsel"]
["counsel"]
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Ruling on admissibility of evidence
Message Content
The judge ruled against allowing evidence of a single instance of sexual harassment due to the absence of a pattern or a proffer as to its falsity. The judge did allow questioning related to a tabloid, citing credibility and impeachment.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00018408.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a sidebar discussion where a judge rules to exclude evidence of a single sexual harassment allegation due to a lack of a pattern or proffer of falsity. Following the ruling, two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim, discuss a planned line of questioning for a witness. Ms. Sternheim clarifies her intent is not to ask about the witness's ex-husband, but rather to ask if the witness had requested a friend to plant drugs on the father of her child.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication