📧 Communication

brief

Communication Details

To
["U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit"] ["U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit"]
Date
October 31, 2019
Subject
Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Message Content

In a responsive brief, the government expressed sympathy for Wild and regret for past communication, but argued that CVRA obligations did not attach.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00021446.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This legal document details the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein case concerning victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Following Epstein's death, a district court denied the victims' (petitioners') motion for remedies, such as rescinding the non-prosecution agreement, deeming the issue moot. The document also covers an appeal by a victim named Wild and the government's legal arguments that its CVRA obligations were not triggered because charges were never filed in the original district.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication