The Court questions MS. MOE's argument, suggesting that the conduct she points to as evidence of an ongoing conspiracy is 'definitionally non-conspiracy conduct'.
This court transcript excerpt details a legal argument between counsel (MS. MOE) and the judge (THE COURT) about the end date of a criminal conspiracy. MS. MOE argues the conspiracy continued through the end of 2004, citing testimony from a witness named Carolyn who stated she was continually at Epstein's house during 2004 and 2005. The Court questions this line of reasoning, suggesting the actions described may constitute 'non-conspiracy conduct'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication