Mr. Pagliuca states his disagreement with Ms. Comey, asserting that the omission of details is significant.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, in front of a judge. The discussion focuses on whether omissions in a legal complaint regarding specific sex acts are inconsistent with a witness's testimony. The judge concludes that the testified detail is significant and sustains an objection related to the matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication