A philosophical/sociological discussion arguing that 'inherent female submission' is the wrong question, defending BDSM/submission as compatible with feminism, and emphasizing consent.
This document page appears to be a printout of an essay or blog post discussing the intersection of feminism and BDSM. The author argues against the concept of 'inherent female submission' as a problematic framework, asserting that submission can be a sign of strength and does not affect professional capability (e.g., being a CEO). The text emphasizes the absolute necessity of consent ('Rape is still rape') regardless of kink dynamics. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in an investigation involving correspondence or reading materials of individuals associated with the Epstein case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication