File not found.

📧 Communication

Essay/Article

Communication Details

From
To
Public readership Public readership
Subject
Inherent female submission and BDSM
Message Content

A philosophical/sociological discussion arguing that 'inherent female submission' is the wrong question, defending BDSM/submission as compatible with feminism, and emphasizing consent.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018548.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document page appears to be a printout of an essay or blog post discussing the intersection of feminism and BDSM. The author argues against the concept of 'inherent female submission' as a problematic framework, asserting that submission can be a sign of strength and does not affect professional capability (e.g., being a CEO). The text emphasizes the absolute necessity of consent ('Rape is still rape') regardless of kink dynamics. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in an investigation involving correspondence or reading materials of individuals associated with the Epstein case.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication