📧 Communication
conversationCommunication Details
From
Mr. Schectman, Ms. Brune, Ms. Trzaskoma
Linked to Mr. Schectman
To
["Mr. Schectman", "Ms. Brune", "Ms. Trzaskoma"]
["Mr. Schectman", "Ms. Brune", "Ms. Trzaskoma"]
Date
November 05, 2025
Subject
Suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1
Message Content
A conversation on the plaza where the participants discussed whether to bring to the Court's attention the fact that a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad had the same name as Juror No. 1. They concluded it was unnecessary.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00009414.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript of a cross-examination where Mr. Schectman is questioned by Ms. Edelstein. The questioning centers on why Schectman and his colleagues, Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma, failed to inform the court after discovering on May 12th that a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad shared the same name as Juror No. 1. Schectman defends their decision, stating they concluded it was 'inconceivable' that the juror was the same person, and denies any attempt to 'sandbag the Court'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication