Juror No. 50 told several media outlets that he was a victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse as a child, which contradicts his answers during the voir dire process.
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell is entitled to a new trial. The basis for the argument is that a juror, identified as Juror No. 50, provided false answers during the jury selection process (voir dire) by denying he had ever been a victim of a crime or sexual abuse. The document asserts that the juror later admitted to media outlets that he was a victim of childhood sexual abuse, and that this dishonesty was material to his ability to serve as an impartial juror, thus satisfying the legal test for a new trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication